Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe now $200 cheaper

Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe, which we just saw in the flesh yesterday, has already been listed for a full $150 cheaper than expected. Of course, an immediate price drop was definitely in order given the $1,000 starting tag, but we can't even say we're tempted at a few bucks under $800. Ah well, at least we're headed in the right direction.

[Thanks, Ron]

[Shinigami @ Jan 10th 2009 2:17AM]

"Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe now $200" would have made my day. "Cheaper" ruined it all.
I wonder if people at Kodak think they'll sell many for this much money....

[silverblackvoid @ Jan 10th 2009 2:28AM]

still expensive

[will @ Jan 10th 2009 4:21AM]

2nd comment!

[nikster @ Jan 10th 2009 3:21AM]

Are they serious about that huge Kodak logo on top? Do they really think I want to watch my family pictures "presented by Kodak"? Picture frames should be text free, and most certainly brand name free....

[James Pennington @ Jan 10th 2009 11:34AM]

It looks like the logo may be illuminated like the control buttons along the perimeter and therefore may only be illuminated during menu operations. My guess is that it is normally off during evryday photo-frame duties.

[superhobo @ Jan 10th 2009 4:30AM]

Half a meh.

[MarZau @ Jan 10th 2009 6:50AM]

For $800 it better have usb ports and a Playstation 3 built into the back of it.

[conor @ Jan 10th 2009 8:49AM]

In the article it post it says $150 cheaper, and the title says $200 cheaper.

[Marcin @ Jan 10th 2009 8:52AM]

Why has it got glowing KODAK name on it? It's a photo frame. It should concetrate our attention on a photo and not the maker brand. If KODAK wants to advertise using photoframes maybe THEY should pay US.

[TRB @ Jan 10th 2009 7:46PM]

Why's the title say $200 but the story say $150. Why can't the editor keep it the same?

[CE @ Jan 13th 2009 12:34PM]

What's the source for this post? I spoke with Kodak and they said they were not dropping the price.