Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe now $200 cheaper
By Darren Murph 
posted Jan 10th 2009 1:28AM
posted Jan 10th 2009 1:28AM
[Thanks, Ron]
posted Jan 10th 2009 1:28AM
The amount of electronics thrown away rather than recycled in 2007.
The EPA reports that 82% of electronics disposal in 2007 ended up in the garbage (mostly landfills) rather than a recycling center. (source: EPA, July 2008)
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe now $200" would have made my day. "Cheaper" ruined it all.
I wonder if people at Kodak think they'll sell many for this much money....
still expensive
2nd comment!
Are they serious about that huge Kodak logo on top? Do they really think I want to watch my family pictures "presented by Kodak"? Picture frames should be text free, and most certainly brand name free....
It looks like the logo may be illuminated like the control buttons along the perimeter and therefore may only be illuminated during menu operations. My guess is that it is normally off during evryday photo-frame duties.
Half a meh.
For $800 it better have usb ports and a Playstation 3 built into the back of it.
In the article it post it says $150 cheaper, and the title says $200 cheaper.
Why has it got glowing KODAK name on it? It's a photo frame. It should concetrate our attention on a photo and not the maker brand. If KODAK wants to advertise using photoframes maybe THEY should pay US.
Why's the title say $200 but the story say $150. Why can't the editor keep it the same?
What's the source for this post? I spoke with Kodak and they said they were not dropping the price.